<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nationwide Low-Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) Would Send Gasoline and Diesel Prices Skyrocketing, Wipe Out Millions of American Jobs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.secureourfuels.org/2010/06/17/nationwide-low-carbon-fuel-standard-lcfs-would-send-gasoline-and-diesel-prices-skyrocketing-wipe-out-millions-of-american-jobs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.secureourfuels.org/2010/06/17/nationwide-low-carbon-fuel-standard-lcfs-would-send-gasoline-and-diesel-prices-skyrocketing-wipe-out-millions-of-american-jobs/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 May 2011 03:39:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lost in Translation &#171; Secure Our Fuels</title>
		<link>http://www.secureourfuels.org/2010/06/17/nationwide-low-carbon-fuel-standard-lcfs-would-send-gasoline-and-diesel-prices-skyrocketing-wipe-out-millions-of-american-jobs/comment-page-1/#comment-269</link>
		<dc:creator>Lost in Translation &#171; Secure Our Fuels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 22:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.secureourfuels.com/?p=1058#comment-269</guid>
		<description>[...] our country to grow its dependence on far-away, unstable energy to make up the difference (and costing lots of jobs in the process). So why would the Canadians support a policy like that? Short answer: They [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] our country to grow its dependence on far-away, unstable energy to make up the difference (and costing lots of jobs in the process). So why would the Canadians support a policy like that? Short answer: They [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

