<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Map</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.secureourfuels.org/map/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.secureourfuels.org</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 May 2011 03:39:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wisconsin Consumers Soundly Reject Job-Killing LCFS Proposal &#171; Secure Our Fuels</title>
		<link>http://www.secureourfuels.org/map/comment-page-1/#comment-1121</link>
		<dc:creator>Wisconsin Consumers Soundly Reject Job-Killing LCFS Proposal &#171; Secure Our Fuels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 21:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.secureourfuels.com/?page_id=185#comment-1121</guid>
		<description>[...] no wonder that consumers in states like Wisconsin – which receives 47 percent of its oil from Canada – squarely reject LCFS [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] no wonder that consumers in states like Wisconsin – which receives 47 percent of its oil from Canada – squarely reject LCFS [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: National, State Groups Join CEA in Efforts to Combat Job-Killing LCFS Schemes &#171; Secure Our Fuels</title>
		<link>http://www.secureourfuels.org/map/comment-page-1/#comment-586</link>
		<dc:creator>National, State Groups Join CEA in Efforts to Combat Job-Killing LCFS Schemes &#171; Secure Our Fuels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 17:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.secureourfuels.com/?page_id=185#comment-586</guid>
		<description>[...] the state. In fact, both WMC and the WPMA recently released straightforward documents about how an LCFS would hurt Wisconsin, its economy and its ability to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the state. In fact, both WMC and the WPMA recently released straightforward documents about how an LCFS would hurt Wisconsin, its economy and its ability to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: State LCFS Profile: Michigan &#171; Secure Our Fuels</title>
		<link>http://www.secureourfuels.org/map/comment-page-1/#comment-391</link>
		<dc:creator>State LCFS Profile: Michigan &#171; Secure Our Fuels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2011 22:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.secureourfuels.com/?page_id=185#comment-391</guid>
		<description>[...] to depend on its neighbors in Canada for the fuel it needs to run its commercial sector; today, more than 63 percent of the oil consumed in the state comes from Canada.  In fact, these imports come from nowhere else [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to depend on its neighbors in Canada for the fuel it needs to run its commercial sector; today, more than 63 percent of the oil consumed in the state comes from Canada.  In fact, these imports come from nowhere else [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Oil Imports Safer, Friendlier Than Your 401(K) &#171; Secure Our Fuels</title>
		<link>http://www.secureourfuels.org/map/comment-page-1/#comment-385</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Oil Imports Safer, Friendlier Than Your 401(K) &#171; Secure Our Fuels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2011 21:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.secureourfuels.com/?page_id=185#comment-385</guid>
		<description>[...] The LCFS, right up top, is listed as a restraint on future oil sands development, and clear inhibitor of economic growth on both sides of the U.S.-Canadian [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The LCFS, right up top, is listed as a restraint on future oil sands development, and clear inhibitor of economic growth on both sides of the U.S.-Canadian [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Now We’re (Finally) Talking – Part II &#171; Secure Our Fuels</title>
		<link>http://www.secureourfuels.org/map/comment-page-1/#comment-382</link>
		<dc:creator>Now We’re (Finally) Talking – Part II &#171; Secure Our Fuels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2011 21:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.secureourfuels.com/?page_id=185#comment-382</guid>
		<description>[...] day that’s needed to fuel our cars, trucks and minivans wouldn’t necessarily change – but the places from which those resources come (and the amounts provided by each) would certainly see a dramatic [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] day that’s needed to fuel our cars, trucks and minivans wouldn’t necessarily change – but the places from which those resources come (and the amounts provided by each) would certainly see a dramatic [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: N-O Canada! Whole Foods Bows to Pressure Groups on Canadian Oil-Sands, Provides China with New Opening to Claim U.S-bound Energy &#171; Secure Our Fuels</title>
		<link>http://www.secureourfuels.org/map/comment-page-1/#comment-373</link>
		<dc:creator>N-O Canada! Whole Foods Bows to Pressure Groups on Canadian Oil-Sands, Provides China with New Opening to Claim U.S-bound Energy &#171; Secure Our Fuels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2011 20:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.secureourfuels.com/?page_id=185#comment-373</guid>
		<description>[...] Michigan and Illinois can possibly expect to comply with this stricture – given that more than 50 percent of petroleum supplies available in these states come from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michigan and Illinois can possibly expect to comply with this stricture – given that more than 50 percent of petroleum supplies available in these states come from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CEA Comes Out Swinging in Debate Over Secure, Canadian Energy &#171; Secure Our Fuels</title>
		<link>http://www.secureourfuels.org/map/comment-page-1/#comment-372</link>
		<dc:creator>CEA Comes Out Swinging in Debate Over Secure, Canadian Energy &#171; Secure Our Fuels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2011 20:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.secureourfuels.com/?page_id=185#comment-372</guid>
		<description>[...] Michigan and Illinois can possibly expect to comply with this structure – given that more than 50 percent of petroleum supplies available in these states come from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michigan and Illinois can possibly expect to comply with this structure – given that more than 50 percent of petroleum supplies available in these states come from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wisc.’s Business Leaders to the Guv: LCFS is a Job-Killer &#171; Secure Our Fuels</title>
		<link>http://www.secureourfuels.org/map/comment-page-1/#comment-368</link>
		<dc:creator>Wisc.’s Business Leaders to the Guv: LCFS is a Job-Killer &#171; Secure Our Fuels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2011 19:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.secureourfuels.com/?page_id=185#comment-368</guid>
		<description>[...] level in Congress, would effectively ban affordable and secure Canadian oil reserves – which helps meet 50 percent of Wisconsin’s needs – from reaching consumers, farmers and small businesses in the Badger [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] level in Congress, would effectively ban affordable and secure Canadian oil reserves – which helps meet 50 percent of Wisconsin’s needs – from reaching consumers, farmers and small businesses in the Badger [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Too Spendy: Low-Carbon Fuel Standard a Bad Deal for Wisconsin &#171; Secure Our Fuels</title>
		<link>http://www.secureourfuels.org/map/comment-page-1/#comment-367</link>
		<dc:creator>Too Spendy: Low-Carbon Fuel Standard a Bad Deal for Wisconsin &#171; Secure Our Fuels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2011 19:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.secureourfuels.com/?page_id=185#comment-367</guid>
		<description>[...] deal for folks who live in Kentucky. But for residents of the Badger State, who rely on Canada for nearly 50 percent of the oil the state consumes each day, the consequences would be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] deal for folks who live in Kentucky. But for residents of the Badger State, who rely on Canada for nearly 50 percent of the oil the state consumes each day, the consequences would be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Copycats in Husky-Land &#171; Secure Our Fuels</title>
		<link>http://www.secureourfuels.org/map/comment-page-1/#comment-366</link>
		<dc:creator>Copycats in Husky-Land &#171; Secure Our Fuels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2011 19:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.secureourfuels.com/?page_id=185#comment-366</guid>
		<description>[...] understand why that is, first you have to know a little about where each state gets its energy. In California, a plurality of the state’s oil comes from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] understand why that is, first you have to know a little about where each state gets its energy. In California, a plurality of the state’s oil comes from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

