<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oil Sands 101</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.secureourfuels.org/oil-sands-101/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.secureourfuels.org</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 May 2011 03:39:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JUST THE FACTS: Top Canadian Official, Wis. Manufacturers Underscore LCFS Threats &#171; Secure Our Fuels</title>
		<link>http://www.secureourfuels.org/oil-sands-101/comment-page-1/#comment-351</link>
		<dc:creator>JUST THE FACTS: Top Canadian Official, Wis. Manufacturers Underscore LCFS Threats &#171; Secure Our Fuels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2011 18:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.secureourfuels.com/?page_id=204#comment-351</guid>
		<description>[...] families and businesses more than 2.5 million barrels of petroleum each day and are considered one of the world’s largest known energy deposits – Gore claims that these abundant reserves will “jeopardize the survival of our [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] families and businesses more than 2.5 million barrels of petroleum each day and are considered one of the world’s largest known energy deposits – Gore claims that these abundant reserves will “jeopardize the survival of our [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reuters: Because of its LCFS, “California appears to have no choice but to increase [oil imports from afar]” &#171; Secure Our Fuels</title>
		<link>http://www.secureourfuels.org/oil-sands-101/comment-page-1/#comment-347</link>
		<dc:creator>Reuters: Because of its LCFS, “California appears to have no choice but to increase [oil imports from afar]” &#171; Secure Our Fuels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2011 18:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.secureourfuels.com/?page_id=204#comment-347</guid>
		<description>[...] carbon fuel standard (LCFS) – a policy that discriminates against certain affordable and reliable North American energy supplies from reaching its market. Under such a plan, consistent with its design, California must have to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] carbon fuel standard (LCFS) – a policy that discriminates against certain affordable and reliable North American energy supplies from reaching its market. Under such a plan, consistent with its design, California must have to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Venue Menu: Sierra Club Attempt to Venue Shop on Alberta Clipper Lawsuit Struck Down in Federal Court &#171; Secure Our Fuels</title>
		<link>http://www.secureourfuels.org/oil-sands-101/comment-page-1/#comment-343</link>
		<dc:creator>Venue Menu: Sierra Club Attempt to Venue Shop on Alberta Clipper Lawsuit Struck Down in Federal Court &#171; Secure Our Fuels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2011 18:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.secureourfuels.com/?page_id=204#comment-343</guid>
		<description>[...] good measure, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers with an eye on stopping abundant supplies of secure Canadian oil from reaching American [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] good measure, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers with an eye on stopping abundant supplies of secure Canadian oil from reaching American [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greenpeace’s War on Reality &#171; Secure Our Fuels</title>
		<link>http://www.secureourfuels.org/oil-sands-101/comment-page-1/#comment-331</link>
		<dc:creator>Greenpeace’s War on Reality &#171; Secure Our Fuels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2011 17:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.secureourfuels.com/?page_id=204#comment-331</guid>
		<description>[...] Fuel Standard (LCFS) in the United States and those working to end the development of the oil sands in Canada are fighting two fronts in the same battle: namely, the battle against affordable, abundant [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fuel Standard (LCFS) in the United States and those working to end the development of the oil sands in Canada are fighting two fronts in the same battle: namely, the battle against affordable, abundant [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CEA joins Environment Minister of Alberta, Consumer Groups and Policy Experts for Boston Forum on LCFS &#171; Secure Our Fuels</title>
		<link>http://www.secureourfuels.org/oil-sands-101/comment-page-1/#comment-258</link>
		<dc:creator>CEA joins Environment Minister of Alberta, Consumer Groups and Policy Experts for Boston Forum on LCFS &#171; Secure Our Fuels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 18:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.secureourfuels.com/?page_id=204#comment-258</guid>
		<description>[...] with an overview of the latest technological advances being deployed to develop Alberta’s oil sands in an environmentally sensitive way. Renner also discussed why an LCFS will not reduce carbon emissions and highlighted that CO2 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] with an overview of the latest technological advances being deployed to develop Alberta’s oil sands in an environmentally sensitive way. Renner also discussed why an LCFS will not reduce carbon emissions and highlighted that CO2 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Energy Security 101: University Profs Highlight the Importance Oils Sands, Unconventional Energy Forms &#171; Secure Our Fuels</title>
		<link>http://www.secureourfuels.org/oil-sands-101/comment-page-1/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>Energy Security 101: University Profs Highlight the Importance Oils Sands, Unconventional Energy Forms &#171; Secure Our Fuels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.secureourfuels.com/?page_id=204#comment-85</guid>
		<description>[...] – was that the US must embrace all forms of energy, especially affordable and reliable reserves right here in our own [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] – was that the US must embrace all forms of energy, especially affordable and reliable reserves right here in our own [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: As the Senate Gears Up on Climate Change, LCFS Sure to Surface &#171; Secure Our Fuels</title>
		<link>http://www.secureourfuels.org/oil-sands-101/comment-page-1/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>As the Senate Gears Up on Climate Change, LCFS Sure to Surface &#171; Secure Our Fuels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 21:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.secureourfuels.com/?page_id=204#comment-84</guid>
		<description>[...] of the authors clearing some space for a low-carbon fuel standard (LCFS), effectively blocking Canadian oil from reaching US [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the authors clearing some space for a low-carbon fuel standard (LCFS), effectively blocking Canadian oil from reaching US [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Resource Minister to US: LCFS Would Lead to “More Reliance on OPEC Nations” &#171; Secure Our Fuels</title>
		<link>http://www.secureourfuels.org/oil-sands-101/comment-page-1/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Resource Minister to US: LCFS Would Lead to “More Reliance on OPEC Nations” &#171; Secure Our Fuels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 19:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.secureourfuels.com/?page_id=204#comment-77</guid>
		<description>[...] contain a low-carbon fuel standard (LCFS) mandate, this proposal – which would effectively ban our nation’s most affordable and reliable energy forms from reaching American consumers – continues to grab [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] contain a low-carbon fuel standard (LCFS) mandate, this proposal – which would effectively ban our nation’s most affordable and reliable energy forms from reaching American consumers – continues to grab [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

