Posts Tagged ‘Dave Nemo’

Whatley Featured on “Trucker Radio”

Thursday, August 5th, 2010

CEA vice president Michael Whatley was a featured guest last Thursday on XM Radio’s “The Dave Nemo Show,” a favorite morning drive program of the trucking industry, where he discussed the latest movement on a national LCFS, and took the opportunity to explain some of the findings from CEA’s latest study on the economic and energy impacts of the policy.  Listen to the full interview HERE.  The following are a few key comments from Michael:

  • “Even the guys that have created this program will admit none of the low carbon fuels that they are trying to force drivers into using are ready for primetime. And the vernacular that they use is that this is a technology-forcing regulation, which means that if we mandate that people use it, then someone will come along and make it.  Our economy can’t stand that kind of whipsaw right now.”
  • “Consumer Energy Alliance actually put out a study about a month ago that showed that if you put a low carbon fuel standard in place, it’s going to raise gas and diesel prices by 90 percent over five years, and up to 170 percent over ten years. So we’re basically going to go anywhere from doubling to tripling our gas prices for the next ten years…”
  • “You can get people to drive less. You can get people to burn less gas … These are all different ways that you can try and reduce emissions, [but] at the end of the day when you’re talking about diesel or you’re talking about gasoline, a gallon is a gallon is a gallon. [Y]ou cannot reduce the carbon emissions that are coming off of combusting a gallon of diesel or a gallon of gasoline.  They call it a hydrocarbon for a reason.”
  • “Cellulosic ethanol, and renewable diesel; those are great things.  But the fact is that our economy is completely dependent on being able to move goods around the country, and being able to move people around the country and so we can’t take gasoline and diesel off the table until those other fuels are ready for primetime. “
  • ”We did a forum on low carbon fuel standards in Boston last month and we had Anne Lynch from  the Massachusetts Motor Transportation Association up there come and speak at the forum and she said … 93.5 percent of all goods in Massachusetts are coming from the bed of a truck. … Now if you’re going to double your transportation costs for everything that goes in the grocery store or everything in a furniture store in the northeast, what is that going to do to the prices of those things? The economic ripple effect … would be absolutely extraordinary.”
  • “There is a climate change and energy bill that Senator [Harry] Reid intends to bring up sometime this fall and we fully expect to see folks trying to impose a low carbon fuel standard on that bill. And we also expect, frankly, that we’re going to see some folks talking about an amendment on the OCS bill and try to get a low carbon fuel standard in there… So fortunately right now it looks like we’ve dodged a bullet, but we can’t really rest on our laurels at this point.”

Talkin’ to Truckers on “The Open Road”

Thursday, September 17th, 2009

David Holt, president of Consumer Energy Alliance (CEA), recently joined Dave Nemo on his radio show “The Open Road” to discuss the energy, national security and economic problems associated with low-carbon fuel standard (LCFS) proposals under consideration in Washington.

In case you missed it, here are some of the key takeaways from Holt’s interview:

On the Reality of an LCFS

  • “The LCFS is a misguided attempt to improve the environment by forcing fuels onto the American public that would reduce carbon. At first blush – like communism – it kind of makes sense. But if you really peel back the onion a little bit, we don’t have the technology to meet the designs of these low carbon fuel standards and it would actually increase imports … petroleum fuels that are found in the Middle East, Libya, Nigeria and Russia.”

On the Problems with a One-Size-Fits-All LCFS Approach

  • “When you are forcing this one-size-fits-all low carbon approach you are actually penalizing the North American crudes. We currently get about 4 billion gallons a year of oil sands from Canada … So our national energy security is hooked to our friends from the north who are looking at these federal proposals and discussions on LCFS and saying, ‘Do we have the market in the U.S. that we think that we did? Perhaps we should start talking to China and other nations that are more than willing to take our crude from oil sands.’”

On China, Russia, and Venezuela Positioning Themselves to Secure Energy Supplies

  • “There was a major deal signed last week between China and Canada to specifically start taking Canadian oil sands and shipping it over to China. We also now have Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez over in Russia negotiating for the Russians to come into the Western Hemisphere to grab some of the available energy there. This is a global issue and we are the only nation on earth looking at ways to restrict our own energy.”

On the Effects that an LCFS Will Have on the Price at the Pump

  • An LCFS is designed to do just that: raise energy prices. It will make our fuels scarcer and increase our fuel prices by at a minimum of 60 cents per gallon for diesel fuel … At a time when this country needs to get back on its feet, this is not the right policy and certainly not at the right time.”

As Dave Nemo and his listeners learned, the American public – especially the truckers responsible for moving the goods and products consumers rely on everyday – have reason to be concerned about an LCFS.

Click HERE to read an article by leading trucking publications about this important issue.

DOCUMENT CENTER

INTERACTIVE MAP

Find out the fuel profile of your state – and what a one-size-fits-all national fuel mandate might mean for jobs, gas prices, and security.

image