Comments on: What Is LCFS?

By: Keystone Cops « Secure Our Fuels

Keystone Cops « Secure Our Fuels — Thu, 08 Jul 2010 13:43:08 +0000

[...] folks who spurred the Waxman letter to State. The bigger prize is the nationwide imposition of a Low-Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS), a purposefully complicated initiative put forward for the simple purpose of preventing [...]

By: CEA joins Environment Minister of Alberta, Consumer Groups and Policy Experts for Boston Forum on LCFS « Secure Our Fuels

Wed, 07 Jul 2010 15:02:42 +0000

[...] by Consumer Energy Alliance, that examined the potentially adverse consequences of imposing a Low-Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) on the Northeast, an initiative supported by 11 Northeast and mid-Atlantic governors, and [...]

By: CEA continues the fight against job-killing LCFS, as China’s appetite for oil sands grows « Secure Our Fuels

Mon, 03 May 2010 13:41:41 +0000

[...] heard of this well-intended (perhaps) yet terribly misguided proposal? It’s called a Low-Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS). Unfortunately, proponents of LCFS policies aren’t telling the American public that this [...]

By: LCFS in KGL: Prescription for Higher Fuel Costs and Increased Imports from Unstable Regions of the World « Secure Our Fuels

Wed, 07 Apr 2010 15:19:57 +0000

[...] look like, and what its potential effects may be. While it’s still too early to tell if a national, one-size-fits-all Low-Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) will be included in the legislation, Consumer Energy Alliance (CEA) is working tirelessly to [...]

By: Canada’s Top US Diplomat: U.S. mustn’t discriminate against Canadian oil sands « Secure Our Fuels

Mon, 22 Mar 2010 18:04:06 +0000

[...] will continue to educate the public about this terrible misguided policy that could lead to higher prices at the pump, fewer good-paying jobs for Americans and expanded dependence on dangerous, unstable region’s of [...]

By: Now We’re (Finally) Talking – Part II « Secure Our Fuels

Now We’re (Finally) Talking – Part II « Secure Our Fuels — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:43:35 +0000

[...] to be able to engage in a thoughtful conversation about the consequences associated with the Low-Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) – especially because, until now, there really hasn’t been enough discussion about an [...]

By: State LCFS Profile: Rhode Island « Secure Our Fuels

State LCFS Profile: Rhode Island « Secure Our Fuels — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 18:54:59 +0000

[...] carbon content of fuel while reducing the amount of CO2 emitted from our tailpipes, in reality the Low-Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) isn’t about making the fuels in your vehicle any better, cleaner or more affordable than [...]

By: Fmr. NHL Goalie Takes Slap Shot Directly at U.S. Energy Security « Secure Our Fuels

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 22:01:37 +0000

[...] or individual states, were to ban Canadian oil from reaching American consumers – as a Low-Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) seeks to achieve – where would the fuel come from to meet our nation’s growing energy [...]

By: CEA comes out swinging in debate over secure, Canadian energy « Secure Our Fuels

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 16:42:14 +0000

[...] Martin with the National Post captured the relevance of this announcement in regards to Low-Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) in the U.S. through his article “Alberta’s economy doesn’t fit Whole Foods [...]

By: CEA Continues LCFS Battle by Taking California’s LCFS to Court « Secure Our Fuels

Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:07:31 +0000

[...] Fresno, California’s federal district court, requesting an immediate injunction on the state’s Low-Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) until a number of substantive legal concerns can be addressed. In its complaint, CEA states that [...]